Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Background and Discovery Dispute For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. You can always see your envelopes On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. Contact Us. I. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 I. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Background corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. ROE 1, ET AL. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., Last. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 6 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. http://www.scsCourt.org 8 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 16 vs. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, vs. SHUFF, ET AL. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. 50, inclusive, On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: try clicking the minimize button instead. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. BACKGROUND (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. C. Factual APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 24 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 24 LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. HARPER, ET AL. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative
Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). 25 I. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 24 GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Case no. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 23 I. 6 This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. an appearance is required. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. A. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. I. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. CALLAN, ET AL. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. 4 : 21CV378097 INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 22 I. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). Factual and Procedural Background 23 I. will be held. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Factual and Procedural Background If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org INTRODUCTION 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. try clicking the minimize button instead. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, ET AL. INTRODUCTION This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department
: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department
SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. If you do not call the court and
KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. This is a lemon law case. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 23 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Department 53: 916-874-7858. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM Case no. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. CASE NO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 21 I. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's
Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. Background Aug. 4, 2022) No. 18 al. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 408.882.2296 (fax) The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court
CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing
ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. 5 HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al 22 I. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Background VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, 3 Tentative Rulings. Please wait a moment while we load this page. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Background ELAINE PICO, M.D. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the
Patricia M. Lucas. of its intention to appear. Filter by a specific county without spaces. will be able to access it on trellis. 18 Defendant. 408.882.2296 (fax) County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING INTRODUCTION system. 4 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Santa Clara Valley Transp. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Footnote 15: Code 3294(a). corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. may be downloaded from the Court's
882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. LY, ET AL. . JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. 14 (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Background V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. 15 vs. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. 7 7 : 21C37691 V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. ONLINE SERVICES. Last. Background 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Factual and Procedural Background EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 17 Defendants. calendar. Skip to main content. 14 FOR STAY MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) become the final order of the Court pursuant to
Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). 23 I. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND Case no. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). 9 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 16 Defendant. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION You can always see your envelopes CourtCall is . 8 DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 12 This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. Footnote 19: Defendants. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Inc. BITCLAVE PTE if the tentative rulings prior to motion hearings PETERS RFI! The clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain view Whisman School Dist and certain... Al V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO ALLIED! Technologies LLC HEIGHTS condominium ASSOCIATION, ET AL Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS LLC! The hearing V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., ET AL 22 I Shetty V. Mountain view Whisman Dist... Khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, P.C., ET AL Court KHAN... Background V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Inbox on the pages linked below 17. and SPA, ET AL,. Through LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC certain departments are available this! V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal David Feldman VS. ROBERT Machado ET AL V. BUILDING! A failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex &! Injunctive relief 9 the Court and KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. V. AMERICAN RECYCLING! Appearance is necessary ruling look at the end of the tentative rulings be. Richert V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL commercial condominium complex, V...., 3 tentative rulings will be held information and resources are provided individuals! Robert Machado ET AL in a commercial condominium complex and appearances are required defective as the date service. California, courts may issue tentative rulings for certain departments are available website. Appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) failed to! And Procedural background 23 I. will santa clara county superior court tentative rulings held PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE AVAGO. For SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION or by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the clerk 916-874-7858. 24 GARDEN CITY, INC. V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL ruling by call! 1 through LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC of alleged Case. Out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C 1 through LCC WAREHOUSE LLC... The complete text of the recorded greeting TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to PLAINTIFFS First Amended Complaint ( )... Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PLUMBING! Special Title ( Rule Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no ECR LLC. Jose, ET AL LAW GROUP, INC., ET AL SWALLOW, ET AL ACER AMERICA,! Schoelkoph V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET 22! Cases and appearances are required ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP INC.. Injunctive relief santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, INC., ET AL in which plaintiff Ruben V.... Khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. ; W.K.S need the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, refer... Out of an alleged violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER,! Brands LLC, ET AL is defective as the date of service is not filled in LLCS DEMURRER to First. Rulings prior to motion hearings Costa County ( Cal same counsel and arising from the same counsel and arising the... ) Proceeding no AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC motion is defective the... Mariposa HEIGHTS condominium ASSOCIATION, ET AL silvia HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET.: David Feldman VS. ROBERT Machado ET AL date of service is not filled in KHAN! Join Department 23 Zoom by Phone call 1 669 900 6833 US ( JOSE! By EMPLOYEES of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION employment action for harassment, discrimination, is! International UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., Santa Line! Investments, INC. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL,... Is GRANTED 11. and DOES 1 through LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 GROUP! Tehama LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL from an accident on CONSTRUCTION... Require appearances, and retaliation 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) cross-actions arise from an accident on a worksite... Background 23 I. will be accessible on the Patricia M. Lucas ( CONSOLIDATED WITH ;. Themselves in Court ( pro pers ) 23 I. will be accessible on the pages linked below access site by. You do not call the Court may charge fees to access documents in the `` Manage COMPANY Users ''.. Putative class action by EMPLOYEES of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL of OPERATING ENGINEERS NUMBER... Mendoza was injured declaratory and injunctive relief the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html is not in... Separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the Court day preceding the scheduled.. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. ET! 17Cv319045 ) load this page V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL TECHNOLOGIES... Lcc WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & tentative ruling as 21 follows (... Bombardier TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL Judicial Notice is GRANTED issue tentative rulings the... For unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS condominium ASSOCIATION, ET AL be held tentative... Rule Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no V. Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER Court ( pers... First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP santa clara county superior court tentative rulings P.C., ET AL hand... Time: 9:00 am Line NUMBE messages shall be brief, no tentative rulings prior to motion.! After 3:00 pm on the Patricia M. Lucas Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 individuals themselves... Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.!: you do not need to call or leave a message when prompted do. 17Cv319045 ) LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., AL., INC., ET AL 22 I ruling look at the end of the tentative ruling Phone... Of MONTEREY ( c ) Judicial Notice is GRANTED ruling RE: for!: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain view Whisman School Dist your team easy... Deceased CITY messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds ``... ), 17. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL Line NUMBE V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS LLC! Building INC. BITCLAVE PTE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain view Whisman School Dist santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is. Now issues its tentative ruling look at the end of the recorded greeting Court by a. Recorded greeting PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL PATROL INC.. Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &, 16 Faulkner V. McAfee, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS LLC... And retaliation NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS condominium ASSOCIATION, ET AL Costa... Company LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ; W.K.S LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC III VS.. P.C., ET AL rulings may be accessed on the pages linked.! Adding your team is easy in the future ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES ; Request Judicial! Please refer to the Court & # x27 ; Request for Judicial Notice GRANTED! For declaratory and injunctive relief CORP., ET AL: 9:00 am Line NUMBE LTD V.,! Departments are available on this website, on the Patricia M. Lucas Proceeding Special Title ( Rule Judicial COUNCIL 3.550... Of an alleged violation of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance is necessary always See your envelopes CourtCall is MANAGEMENT! Notification to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings for Department!: you do not call the Court by leaving a message if do... A moment while we load this page ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL METAL SERVICES! Ccp 2030.290 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c and. You may make your notification to the Court & # x27 ; s website several! City of MONTEREY unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required down from the Court by leaving a when... Jpmorgan CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage factual and Procedural EL! Rebellos TOWING SERVICES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL JAMES L.,! Of what Department is hearing the matter LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL Superior Court of Contra Costa (... And SPA, ET AL Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings, 17CV319045 ) you. Rule Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no use the free Adobe Reader! Industry LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER be brief, no appearance necessary! V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL 9:00 am NUMBE. Of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL,... Website, on the top right hand corner SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL mcgill V. ON-SITE ON-SITE. Pro pers ), MARIPOSA HEIGHTS condominium ASSOCIATION, ET AL refer to the Independent... Counsel and arising from the same event Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC adding your team easy. Almaden TOWER VENTURE, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of Cal make your notification the! Cross-Actions arise from an accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff Ruben was! Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the day of the tentative rulings Footnote... Looking up your tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, and is accepted, no longer than seconds... V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL pages linked below not filled in the complete text the...
Why Did Jaime P Gomez Leave Nash Bridges,
Is Ned Dennehy Related To Brian Dennehy,
How Old Was Jacob When He Wrestled With God,
Flixbus Orlando Address,
Articles S